(215) 520-4000
info@getsonschatz.com
info@getsonschatz.com
Immigration Law Success Stories
January 6, 2012
We represented a client in removal proceedings who had been deemed inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). “Inadmissibility” refers to a person’s ineligibility to receive a visa or to enter the United States. The INA specifies many grounds of inadmissibility under Section 212. Our client was inadmissible because he was convicted of a crime of moral turpitude. Our immigration laws and regulations do not define exactly what a crime of moral turpitude is. However, case-law generally refers to it as “conduct which is inherently base, vile, or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general … it is the nature of the act itself and not the statutory prohibition of it which renders a crime one of moral turpitude.” This quote was taken from Matter of Franklin, 20 I&N Dec. 867, 868 (BIA 1994), aff’d, 72 F.3d 571 (8th Cir. 1995). In this particular case, our client was convicted of counterfeiting goods, which is considered to be a crime of moral turpitude. This crime made him inadmissible. He had filed for a green card based upon a marriage to a US Citizen without the assistance of an attorney. He was unaware that he needed to file an I-601 Waiver Application and following his interview he was only given 30 days to submit a Waiver Application. He did not provide sufficient evidence to show his wife would suffer extreme hardship if he were removed from the U.S. and USCIS denied his Waiver Application and placed him into removal proceedings. Furthermore, he was detained without the opportunity for bond because of his criminal grounds of inadmissibility. We renewed his Form I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility before the Immigration Judge under Section 212(h) of the Immigration & Nationality Act. To be eligible for the 212(h) Waiver, a person must demonstrate extreme hardship that goes beyond the normal hardship faced by a US Citizen or Permanent Resident spouse of parent if the alien were removed from the United States. Our firm submitted a detailed package including a report from a clinical psychologist establishing the extreme hardship that our client’s wife would face if he was removed back to his home country. Following detailed courtroom testimony about the extreme hardship, the Immigration Judge granted the Waiver and also granted our client relief from removal proceedings and adjusted his status to a permanent resident of the United States.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Contact Us
Archives
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
Categories
Asylum Applications (6)
Deportation Defense & Immigration Court Appeals (21)
Extraordinary Ability Aliens (9)
F-1 Student Visas (1)
H-1B Specialty Occupation Visas (41)
K-1 Fiance(e) Visas (4)
L-1 Intracompany Transfer Visas (3)
Marriage & Family Sponsored Green Card Applications (60)
National Interest Waiver Petitions (8)
Naturalization/Citizenship (10)
Outstanding Researchers & Professors (9)
PERM Labor Certification (16)
TN Status under the NAFTA (2)
Uncategorized (27)


